Skip to main content

Watch Diary: Surveillance Oz

Surveillance Oz.

Surveillance Oz is an Australian docu-series reviewing footage from CCTV cameras around Australia, and the crazy things that happen on them. It involves recreations of what happens in the CCTV offices and footage from the original CCTV camera when the incident occurred. There are also interviews with the people watching the CCTV cameras to get their opinions on what had happened.

The interviews in Surveillance Oz are quite formal, but the editing of the show is quite informal and makes it easy to watch. The interviews are in the office itself or on a set, with professional lighting, and it's likely that there is a degree of scripting to the interviews. They also recreate the interactions between the controllers so that the viewer can get an understanding of their reaction, and it's likely quite close to what they were actually saying during the incidents, but there is also a sense of some scripting and direction added to the scenes. Along with this there is a voice-over and title screens to guide the viewer to what is happening. This combined makes for an easily-watched show, as the viewer gets all of the information they need told to them, and it's not a documentary that challenges peoples' opinions on topics. It is purely for entertaining the viewers and also brings attention to how people are often being watched by CCTV even if they don't think so.
I think there's an interest in this kind of documentary because it's easy to watch as you can look away and come back to it and still understand what is going on thanks to the different techniques they're using to tell the story, and, like I mentioned in my previous watch diary, there is the "dark intrigue" of the viewer, as there is the danger of something bad happening to the people on CCTV and the viewer wants to know what is going to happen to them.
It's interesting that they have recreated the scenes. They are done fairly realistically and you probably wouldn't think about them being fake if you just watched the show without analysing it. It helps the viewer to understand how the operators work, and also how the situation played out in both places. It shows how the situation was resolved by the operators.
I found the show interesting but I think this style is better for when the show is reflecting on events that have already been and gone, whereas it wouldn't work if it was showing current events. However, 24 Hours in A&E is quite similar with the interviews and use of what looks like CCTV footage. But the difference is the recreations and that the footage is actually happening at the time of production in 24 Hours. 
I prefer shows like 24 Hours as you're given the chance to connect with the characters, whereas in Surveillance Oz there are no interviews with the people on the footage and you get a follow up title screen but you don't get to know how the people involved were really feeling, making the programme more detached from the viewer, which also explains the easy viewing.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular Posts

Screenwriter: Jack Thorne

Jack Thorne. Jack Thorne is a screenwriter, known most notably for This is England  and Skins , but also stage plays such as Harry Potter and the Cursed Child and Let The Right One In . [1] His work tends to be dark or particularly stylistic. You can see a similarity between a lot of his works, in the way characters relationships are very realistic. He seems to know his characters like they are his friends and family, and write them in a way that makes them particularly relatable and believable to the viewer. In Skins, all of the characters have a friendship that is unique to them. None of them will share the same kind of connection. This can also be said for This is England . From what I've seen in This is England '86 , this sense of unique friendships continues. Every character is different to the last, and they seem to be known in so much detail that you could guess things about them that aren't even shown. He represents real people and real situations, albeit

This House Has People In It (S2S Research)

This House Has People In It. This video is one of my favourite short films by YouTube channel Adult Swim. The video consists of (fiction) surveillance footage from an American family home. The shots show different angles from throughout the house and the production is edited in a format that is much like a security camera scroll- it goes from camera to camera as the scene unfolds. The parents are talking in the kitchen with the daughter lying face down on the floor. Eventually the parents turn the conversation to the daughter on the floor and try to get her up. They believed she was throwing a tantrum but soon realise she's stuck. As the family get more and more panicked she begins to sink into the floor and chaos unfolds as the cameras continue to flick between one another showing the rest of the house. Adult Swim The YouTube channel Adult Swim joined YouTube on March 2nd, 2006. Channel stats from Social Blade . Since then, they have made 8,302 public videos and ga

Documentary: Presenters

Presenters. Presenter-led documentaries create a certain style that is easily engaging for the viewer. They have a sort of 'reference point' to focus on and that feeds them the information they need, while asking the questions they're wondering. As presenter of our group documentary, I want to know what's involved in being a presenter and why a presenter is used for some documentaries, but not others. The Role As a presenter, it's your job to, as you would expect, present the show. Using research that has been done in the pre-production the presenter is able to inform the viewer. They also interact with contributors asking questions, and essentially tell the story of the documentary. It's useful to have a presenter as it means we are likely to get more information from actuality if the presenter asks questions as it's happening. It also adds to the story as the presenter is usually on a journey to learn about the topic of the documentary- this is s